Welcome

Hope you find it useful and please feel free to comment on any of the issues discussed.

Sunday, 22 April 2018

Discourse on that Buhari speech

There has been a  lot of   talk   about   Buhari’ s speech  calling   some Nigeria youth lazy . Part of the discussion has been around language used itself ;  What is meant by some?  Does it imply majority of Nigerian youth ?  Who are the Nigerian youths?  Buhari has been criticised   or praised for raising this issue .  My take on it is that  while he  was making a valid  point, the  point has been lost in translation , generally  it was the wrong point,  at the wrong place, using the wrong words.
 Most leaders will not go to an international forum and criticise there citizenry    using the word  Buhari used .  The reality is  that it gives credence to other people calling Nigerians names like  ‘ lazy ‘  ‘thieves’,  ‘419’    and perpetuates the  stereotyping of Nigerians  internationally.   Furthermore, it does no favour to  all Africans and black people  in the eyes of the world.  There is a narrative that black people are lazy and that’s why they are poor.  That black people are  ‘ backward’   and generally have a low IQ  that  why the remained trapped in poverty in Africa and internationally .  Buhari’s remarks in an international setting   sanctions and perpetuates this narrative.  The notion of calling someone lazy is  linked with the idea  that people  lack agency therefore are  where they are in life. If you are lazy and poor its your fault , mind you this narrative will include all Nigerians and indeed Africans ,   not just the   youth . Africa is where it is people its people are lazy.
 While Buhari might have a point to highlight  the so –called laziness among Nigerian. This best forum will be in Nigeria and definitely not using that term.  There is a problem linked with an over dependence on oil, the ‘oil curse ‘ , or more accurately the development of a mono – culture  in Nigeria .  This has   affected Nigerian drive , motivate , skills , creativity and entrepreneurial spirit , to  a large extend . However, and significantly so, this problem is begins with the ruling elites and their off – springs. It is not the youths that are ‘lazy’    the problems is  a culture of expectation and undue  entitlement that  has developed in  Nigeria.  From local government staff waiting for allocations   from the central government to  people looking for contracts  and plush jobs. This system of patronage and dependency ,  is   enshrined  as part of  the tradition and culture in Nigeria. It has created the need to be corrupt and  to relay  on the so – called national  cake.
Buhari   blaming the youth misses the point, Nigerian society has developed  a culture  that  negates  creativity and  entrepreneurship. A loop- sided capitalist system,  worshipping  money  but not creating wealth , honouring  corrupt accumulation of  money but not true  entrepreneurship.  Contrary to what  Buhari said it is not the youth that   are  at fault  but the failure of the  older post  - colonial  generation and  continuous  failings of the ruling elites.  The majority of the youth have despite  the  obstacles showed resilience,   creativity and entrepreneurship. Nigerian main exporting industry outside the oil sector  is the  music  and movie industries.  One of the main problems with  Nigeria as highlighted by Bill Gate , is the lack of investment in  education and opportunities for young people.

Friday, 4 January 2013

Telecoms operators lose N1.21b in 10 months

Telecoms operators lose N1.21b in 10 months

interesting piece on the telecom industry and economy in Nigeria.

Tuesday, 9 March 2010

Reflection on survey on BME charities Fundings.

'Racism' blamed for decline in funding for ethnic minority charities
By Mathew Little, Third Sector, 9 March 2010
Survey shows that forty-five per cent have had funding cut since recession began


http://www.thirdsector.co.uk/news/index.cfm?fuseaction=TSN.News.DailyBulletin.Article&nNewsID=988739&sHashCode=9DAEE82BC352F96FC034F669F033FAAF&


While we should not expect specific 'ring fencing' of funds for BME organisations. it is a reality that BME communities are disproportionally affected by the recession. The fact is that increasingly standalone BME organisations are perceived as less effective and politically relevant, than mainstream organisations. This change in funding and support emphasises did well for Boris Johnson and continues to play well with a large section of the electorate. It can be and indeed is negative and racist, creating a false and misrepresentative stereotype. However, BME organisational and indeed BME professionals remains an effective way of tackling poverty and social exclusion.

Sunday, 28 February 2010

getting there

Monday, 22 February 2010

SEC manifesto 2010

http://www.thirdsector.co.uk/news/index.cfm?fuseaction=TSN.News.Article.PC&sPageName=Social%20enterprise&nNewsID=984504


The proposal relating to employment is quite interesting, community allowance and investment in local social entrepreneurs enabling them to create and sustain jobs is a commendable and can go a long way in contributing to UK PLC’s recovery. However, I do find out that I agree with some of the criticism of allowing front line public sector staff to establish social enterprises. This policy should involve the users of such services. In many instances, front line staffs are part of the problem, developing a culture that negates the needs/aspirations of users. Localised services should definitely integrate both frontline service providers and users of such services.